Race boxes in US censuses, 1790-2020

Two centuries of creeping government racialization

By William Wetherall

Drafted 9 September 2013
First posted 23 September 2014
Last updated 5 June 2023


National censuses State censuses Personal information and other census data Reliability of census data
Racial classifications 1790-1820 1830 1840-1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Case as ideology "Black / white" versus "Black / White" and "black / white"
1990-03 Normant Ebony 2020-06-18 Appiah The Atlantic 2020-06-30 Carswell The Washington Post 2020-07-29 WashPostPR The Washington Post 2023-05-12 Adichie The Atlantic


National censuses

National censuses have been taken in the United States every 10 years since 1790. By law they are open to public examination after 70 years, hence 1940 is the latest available census. Enumeration standards have changed over the decades, and earlier censuses were not complete.

Enumeration dates

The "as of dates" of "datums" of censuses have varied as follows.

Datum dates of US decennial censuses, 1790 to present
  1st-4th  1790-1820  1st Monday in August
 5th-10th  1830-1880  1 June (Datum 31 May)
     11th  1890       2 June
     12th  1900       1 June
     13th  1910      15 April
     14th  1920       1 January 
From 15th  1930-      1 April

The datum date determines a person's qualification for inclusion in the census as well as the person's age. Say that, in 1920, the population of a certain locality was enumerated on 12 January. Since the datum of the census was 1 January, someone born on 2 January, or who was living somewhere else on 1 January, should not have been counted. And a person born on 7 January 1910 would have been considered 9 rather 10 years old, based on their last birthday before the datum.

Top  


State censuses

In addition to national censuses every 10 years, a few states have carried out full or partial censuses between the national censuses. Iowa, for example, conducted its own censuses in the following years.

Datum dates of Iowa state censuses, 1856-1925
1856  80 of 81 organized counties (community sheets)
1885  All 99 counties (community sheets)
1895  
1905  All 99 counties (individual cards)
1915  All 99 counties (individual cards)
1925  All 99 counties (community sheets)

Iowa stands out as a very pro-census state. The nativity data on its 1925 census includes not only the places of birth but the names of a person's parents and where they were married.

Top  


Personal information and other census data

Enumeration standards evolved as quickly as the growing and spreading nation, and each census has been from slightly to radically different that earlier censuses. There are, however, some notable trends in the kinds of personal information and other data collected by census takers.

1790-1840 censuses

The censuses from 1790 to 1840 are valuable for many purposes, but they centered on information about households rather than about their individuals. They enumerated the name of the head of each household, but little personal information about the head. Other household members are reflected only as tallies broken down by sex and age-group within status categories like free whites, slaves, free colored people, and non-taxed Indians.

The status and age-group breakdowns become increasingly detailed. To the extent they characterize each household, they sometimes allow one to speculate as to whether the household in one census is the same as the household in a later household.

1850-1860 censuses

From 1850, censuses began list individuals within households, and provide information about each individual. From this point, censuses become valuable as sources of information on individuals. It also becomes easier to differentiate households with heads having similar names.

The 1850 and 1860 censuses show the name of the head of each household, followed by the name of each member of the household, and the sex, age, and color (white, black, mulatto), of each free inhabitant, plus columns for other information about each member, including whether the person was deaf and dumb, blind, insane, idiotic, a pauper, or a convict. These two censuses had separate slave schedules, which had columns for writing the name of the slave owner, and the age, sex, and color (but not the name) of each slave, and whether the slave had become a fugitive from the state, or had been manumitted, or was deaf and dumb, blind, insane, or idiotic.

1870-1890 censuses

Since 1870, following the emancipation of slaves after the Civil War of the 1860s, censuses have included all people by name, showing their sex, age, and color (white, black, mulatto, Chinese, Indian). The color classification on the 1890 census included white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian. However, practically all of the 1890 census was destroyed in a fire, hence its data is unavailable.

Knowing a person's "nativity" -- where the person was born -- is a very valuable piece of information. But knowing also the nativity of a person's parents can help differentiate people with similar names and otherwise similar identities. The 1880 census began showing nativity breakdowns by the places of birth of the person, and of the person's mother and father.

1900-1940 censuses

Censuses from 1900 had a column for "Color or race". While earlier "color" categories are also clearly racial, the "racialization" of people began to embrace also "national origin" within broader skin-color classifications -- such as "Chinese" in the 1860 and 1870 censuses, and "Japanese" in the 1890 census.

The 1930 and 1940 censuses, following several earlier censuses, had supplementary schedules for the American Indian population, defined as Indians enrolled as members of federally recognized tribes. Indians on these separate schedules were classified by sex, age, and whether they were "full blood or mixed blood". This is partly due to the declaration by the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act that all therebefore non-citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States were thereafter citizens of the United States.

Non-citizen Indians, who were not taxed, usually lived on reservations, where they were formally affiliated with a tribe and were subject to its jurisdiction. Citizen Indians lived in, and were regarded as part of, the general population, and were subject to the same treatment as other citizens, including taxation. However, an increasing number of non-citizen Indians had moved off their reservation and were living in the general population.

Top  


Reliability of census data

Census data is subject to all manner errors, especially spelling errors. Census enumerators often spelled names the way they sounded to their ear, without confirming their spellings with the family informant -- assuming informant knew the spellings.

Place of birth, and places of birth of parents, are subject to misreporting and misrecording. Informants relied on memory, including memory of hearsay information, and there are cases when memory and hearsay information changes from census to census.

Sex, age, marital status, and race are also subject to erroneous reporting or recording. Reliability is limited by the nature of the classification.

Sex, age, and marital status

Sex, allowing for the lack of categories for rare cases of people who weren't unequivocally either male or female, was perhaps the easiest trait to accurately classify. Age was subject to errors of memory and calculation, but the effects of such errors on age-group breakdowns is negligible. Marital status was accurate to the extent that people didn't lie about their status -- such as by claiming they were married, single, or widowed, rather than admit they were divorced. All census reports I have seen on my own ancestral relatives, however, suggests that people frankly disclosed their actual status.

Race -- despite attempts by race scientists to objectively define racial classifications -- was subject to extremely impressionistic judgments, especially for persons whose features allowed them, or the enumerator, a degree of freedom in choice of classification. This was especially the case for putatively "mixed" persons, but some people who did not think of themselves as "mixed" -- such as an "Chinese" or "White" -- might also be misclassified.

Top  


Racial classifications

Changes in racial classifications on United States censuses tell the history of the official racialization of the country, from its establishment on the foundations of slavery, to the shackles of federal race boxes today.

The information in the following table is based mainly on direct examination of censuses from 1810-1940 (except 1890, which was destroyed in a fire), and the following publication, which celebrated the 100th anniversary of the Census Bureau (1902-2002), formerly the Census Office.

Measuring America 2002

Measuring America: The Decennial Censuses From 1790 to 2000
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau
Washington, D.C.: April 2002
140, 6 pages, PDF file

Also of interest are the following publications.

Indian Affairs Report 1876

Commissioner for Indian Affairs, Office of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior
The Annual Report of the Commissioner for Indian Affairs to the Secretary of the Interior for the Year 1876
Washington: Government Printing Office, 1876
XXV, 357 pages (archive.org)

Hochschild and Powell 2008

Jennifer L. Hochschild and Brenna M. Powell
Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850-1930: Mulattoes, Half-Breeds, Mixed Parentage, Hindoos, and the Mexican Race
Studies in American Political Development
Volume 22, Number 1 (Spring 2008)
Pages 59-96 (Jennifer L. Hochschild, Harvard College

The following website has images of census forms and scans of enumerator instructions for all United States censuses from 1850 to 2010.

IPUMS

Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS)
Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota

Top  

United States census categories related to status, color, or race, 1790-2020
The evolution of America's obsession with skin color and ethnonational ancestry
1790-1840 Free white, 1850-1880 Color, 1890-1940 Color or race, 1950 Race, 1960-1970 Color or race, 1980 Is this person, 1990-2020 Race
1790 Free white males (≥16, <16), Free white females, All other free persons (sex, color), Slaves
1800 Free white males (age), Free white females (age), All other free persons (except Indians not taxed), Slaves
1810 Free white males (age), Free white females (age), All other free persons (except Indians not taxed), Slaves
1820 Free white males (age), Free white females (age), Slaves (sex, age), Free colored persons (sex, age), All others except Indians not taxed
Foreigners not naturalized (White persons)

Indians not taxed

"Indians not taxed" referred to Indians who were living on a reservation under tribal jurisdiction, who were therefore not U.S. citizens. "Taxed Indians" lived as U.S. citizens outside reservations, where they were subject to federal, state, and other applicable laws, and paid taxes like other citizens.

Foreigners not naturalized

The term seems odd, since a foreigner who naturalizes is no longer a foreigner.

Top  

1830 Free white persons, Slaves, Free colored persons, Slaves (all by sex and age)
Deaf and dumb, blind (White persons, Slaves and colored persons)
Aliens -- Foreigners not naturalized (White persons)

First use of uniform schedule

Previously, the states or census marshalls produced their own schedules.

Deaf and dumb, and Aliens

The 1830 census included spaces to tally -- in the words of Measuring America -- "the number of White persons and of "slaves and colored persons," aged under 14 years, 14 and under 25, and 25 years and upward, who were deaf and dumb, but without distinction of sex in either case, and also the number of each of these two classes named who were blind, but without distinction of sex or age; and a statement, of White persons only, who were aliens, i.e., foreigners not naturalized" (Measuring America 2002: 7).

Top  

1840 Free white persons, Free colored persons, Slaves (all by sex and age)
1850 6. Color -- (White, black, or mulatto)
13. Deaf and dumb, blind, insane, idiotic, pauper, or convict

Names of household members listed

Censuses through 1840 showed only the name of the head of each household, followed by the number members in each household broken down by status and sex, and within each status and sex category by gradually more detailed age groups.

Censuses from 1850 showed the names of all members of each household, beginning with the head of the household, usually a male, followed by his wife, then his children in the order of their birth, then others living in the household, including relatives, servants, and non-relative boarders. Each individual was identified a number of traits, which eventually included their relation to the head of household (wife, son, daughter, mother-in-law, servant, boarder, et cetera), sex, age at time of census, color or race, and marital status -- and other traits depending on the particular census.

Census divided into separate "Free" and "Slave" schedules

From 1850, the census was divided into separate "Free Inhabitants" and "Slave Inhabitants" schedules.

"Color" introduced as new classification

Both the "Free Inhabitants" and "Slave Inhabitants" schedules had a "Color" classification.

First "Color" breakdown was White, Black, and Mulatto

The instructions enumerators received regarding entries in the "Color" space for each enumerated person were somewhat different in the two schedules..

"Color" on "Free Inhabitants" schedule

Marshalls and assistants received the following instruction the "Color" column on the "Free Inhabitants" schedule (Measuring America 2002: 10, IPUMS 1850).

6. Under heading 6, entitled "Color," in all cases where the person is white, leave the space blank; in all cases where the person is black, insert the letter B; if mulatto, insert M. It is very desirable that these particulars be carefully regarded.

"Color" on "Free Inhabitants" schedule

Enumerators of the "Slave Inhabitants" schedule received the following instructions concerning "Color" (Measuring America 2002: 12).

Under heading 5, entitled "Color," insert in all cases, when the slave is black, the letter B; when he or she is mulatto, insert M. The color of all slaves should be noted.

No mention is made of "white", which is not to rule out the existence, still, if indentured (not free) whites. If they were found, presumably the "Color" space was left blank, as on the Free Inhabitants schedule.

Rationale for "Mulatto" as sub-classification of "Color"

The justification for including "Mulatto" in the "Color" breakdown the desire of race scientists to attempt to determine the degree to which the "black" population -- defined by a "one-drop" rule -- had become mixed. Some scientists also thought that -- in conjunction with data on birth, death, and marriage, and whether a person was deaf and dumb, blind, insane, idiotic, a pauper, or a convict -- blood quanta data might shed light on the extent to which racially mixed people might be physically or mentally, if not also morally, degenerate. (See Hochschild and Powell 2008 a detailed overview of the debate over the purpose and usefulness of "Mulatto" data.)

Indians not taxed

Enumerators of the "Free Inhabitants" schedule were explicitly instructed that "Indians not taxed are not to be enumerated in this or any other schedule" (Measuring America 2002: 10).

Persons who cannot read or write, and anyone deaf and dumb, et cetera

The 1850 census enumerated "Persons over 20 years of age who can not read and write" and anyone who was "Deaf and dumb, blind, insane, idiotic, pauper, or convict" (Measuring America 2002: 11)

Top  

1860 6. Color -- (White, Black, or Mulatto)
13. Whether deaf and dumb, blind, insane, idiotic, pauper, or convict.

Taxed (citizen) Indians classified as "Indian"

From the 1860 census, enumerators were instructed to classify a "Taxed Indian" as "Indian". "Taxed Indians" were Indians who lived as U.S. citizens outside Indian reservations and were subject to U.S. laws and courts -- as opposed to "Indians not taxed", who generally lived on reservations, and were under tribal jurisdiction and hence were not U.S. citizens. In earlier censuses, taxed Indians had been classified as "White".

Enumerator instructions read as follows (IPUMS 1860).

5. Indians. -- Indians not taxed are not to be enumerated. The families of Indians who have renounced tribal rule, and who under State or Territorial laws exercise the rights of citizens, are to be enumerated. In all such cases write "Ind." opposite their names, in column 6, under heading "Color."

9. Color. -- Under heading 6, entitled "Color," in all cases where the person is white leave the space blank; in all cases where the person is black without admixture insert the letter "B;"if a mulatto, or of mixed blood, write "M;"if an Indian, write "Ind." It is very desirable to have these directions carefully observed.

Slave inhabitants

The 1860 census, like the 1850 census, also had a "Slave Inhabitants" schedule separate from the "Free Inhabitants" schedule. The enumerator instructions read as follows (IPUMS 1860).

5. Color.-- Under heading 5, entitled "Color," insert, in all cases where the slave is black, the letter "B." When he or she is a mulatto insert "M." You are to note the color of every slave. Those who are in any degree of mixed blood are to be termed mulatto, "M."

Top  

1870 6. Color -- White (W.), Black (B.), Mulatto (M.), Chinese (C.), Indian (I.)
18. Whether deaf and dumb, blind, insane, or idiotic.

"Chinese" and "Indian" added to "Color" Classifications

From the 1870 census, "Chinese" and [American] "Indians" became permanent subclassifications of "Color".

"any perceptible trace of African blood"

Marshalls and assistants enumerating the general "Inhabitants" schedule [Schedule 1] received the following instructions concerning the "Color" column (Measuring America 2002: 14, IPUMS 1870).

Color. -- It must not be assumed that, where nothing is written in this column, "White" is to be understood. The column is always to be filled. Be particularly careful in reporting the class Mulatto. The word is here generic, and includes quadroons, octoroons, and all persons having any perceptible trace of African blood. Important scientific results depend upon the correct determination of this class in schedules 1 [Inhabitants] and 2 [Mortality].

Deaf and dumb, et cetera

Instructions concerning deafness and dumbness, among other physical handicaps, were very specific (Measuring America 2002: 15).

Deaf and dumb, Blind, Insane, or Idiotic.. -- Great care will be taken in performing this work of enumeration, so as at once to secure completeness and avoid giving offense. Total blindness and undoubted insanity only are intended in this inquiry. Deafness merely, without the loss of speech, is not to be reported. The fact of idiocy will be better determined by the common consent of the neighborhood, than by attempting to apply any scientific measure to the weakness of the mind or will.

Citizenship

The census had a column called "Constitutional Relations" for specifying the relationship between an enumerated person and the Constitution of the United States -- i.e., whether the person was a citizen, and the quality of the person's citizenship (Measuring America 2002: 15).

Constitutional Relations

Upon the answers to the questions under this head will depend the distribution of representative power in the General Government. It is therefore imperative that this part of the enumeration should be performed with absolute accuracy. Every male person born within the United States, who has attained the age of 21 years, is a citizen of the United States by the force of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution; also, all persons born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers at the time of their birth were citizens of the United States (act of February 10,1855); also, all persons born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, who have been declared by judgment of court to have been duly naturalized, having taken out both "papers."

Naturalization

Naturalization in the United States at the time typically involved 2 steps, (1) filing a declaration of intent or "first papers" after living in the U.S. for 2 years, and (2) filing a petition for naturalization or "second papers" (final papers) after having lived in the U.S. for 5 years. The term "third papers" is sometimes used to refer to the Naturalization Certificate issued following court recognition of the petition.

The Homestead Act of 20 May 1862 required that applicants be U.S. citizens or aliens who had filed first papers. The Alien Soldiers Naturalization Act of 17 July 1862 allowed alien Union Army veterans to naturalize without filing first papers, and after residing in the U.S. for only 1 year (See Darlene C. Goring, "In Service to America: Naturalization of Undocumented Alien Veterans", Seton Hall Law Review, Volume 31, Issue 2, Article 2, 2011, pages 12-13, and note 42, page 13).

Indians

Instructions concerning "Indians" makes reference to the "statistical purposes" of accurately classifying "Indians" wherever they are found (Measuring America 2002: 15, IPUMS 1870).

Indians. -- "Indians not taxed" are not to be enumerated on schedule 1 [Inhabitants]. Indians out of their tribal relations, and exercising the rights of citizens under state or Territorial laws, will be included. In all cases write "Ind." in the column for "Color." Although no provision is made for the enumeration of "Indians not taxed," it is highly desirable, for statistical purposes, that the number of such persons ["Indians not taxed"] not living upon reservations should be known. Assistant marshals are therefore requested, where such persons ["Indians no taxed"] are found within their subdivisions, to make a separate memorandum of names, with sex and age, and embody the same in a special report to the census office.

Top  

1880 4. Color -- White, W.; Black, B.; Mulatto, Mu.; Chinese, C.; Indian, I.
16. Blind, 17. Deaf and Dumb, 18. Idiotic, 19. Insane, 20. Maimed, Crippled, Bedridden, or otherwise disabled

"Important scientific results"

Instructions to enumerators continue to stress that "important scientific results" depend on careful reporting of the blood quanta of persons in "the class mulatto" (IPUMS 1880).

Color. -- It must not be assumed that, where nothing is written in this column, "white" is to be understood. The column is always to be filled. Be particularly careful in reporting the class mulatto. The word is here generic, and includes quadroons, octoroons, and all persons having any perceptible trace of African blood. Important scientific results depend upon the correct determination of this class in schedules 1 [Population] and 5 [Manufacturing].

New Indian policy principles

In The Annual Report of the Commissioner for Indian Affairs to the Secretary of the Interior for the Year 1876, the Commissioner for Indian Affairs, Office of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior stated that the department should adopt the following three policy principles (Indian Affairs Report 1876: VII).

First. Concentration of all Indians on a few reservations.
Second, Allotment to them of lands in severalty.
Third. Extension over them of United States law and the jurisdiction of United States courts.

The report includes statistics on the populations by Males, Females, Total, and Number of Mixed-Bloods for the tribes of each agency by state. There were a total of 266,151 Indians in the United States exclusive of Alaska, of whom 40,639 (15.3 percent) are "mixed-bloods" and 104,818 (39.4%) wear "citizens' dress" (Indian Affairs Report 1876: 222, my percents).

"Indian Division" questionnaire

The 1880 census, reflecting the desire of the Interior Department to have demographic data on Indians, included a special "Indian Division" questionnaire for enumerating Indians living on reservations -- i.e., Indians not taxed. Data included whether the Indian was of full or mixed blood, had been adopted into the tribe, the time the person had lived on a reservation, and the time the person had worn "citizens' dress" -- among numerous other questions (Measuring America 2002: 21).

Top  

1890 5. Color or race -- Whether white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian

"Color" becomes "Color or race

"Quadroon" and "octoroon" join "mulatto" as black-blood quanta
"Japanese" joins "Chinese" as raciopigmental subclassification

The instructions to enumerators of the general schedule for the 1890 census read as follows (Measuring America 2002: 27, IPUMS 1890).

4. Whether white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian.

Write white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian, according to the color or race of the person enumerated. Be particularly careful to distinguish between blacks, mulattoes, quadroons, and octoroons. The word "black" should be used to describe those persons who have three-fourths or more black blood; "mulatto," those persons who have from three-eighths to five-eighths black blood; "quadroon," those persons who have one-fourth black blood; and "octoroon," those persons who have one-eighth or any trace of black blood.

Federal government privatizes tribal lands

The Dawes Severalty Act of 1887, which authorized a government survey of Indian tribal lands with the object of dividing them into parcels for allotment to individual Indians who would thereby own the parcel in severalty.

Severalty refers to terms of ownership in which a person possesses full and exclusive legal rights to a parcel of land. The 1887 act attached the condition that an Indian who wished to receive such an allotment of land had to agree to be a U.S. citizen, and thereby be subject to the laws and courts of the state and federal governments, rather to tribal laws.

This move on the part of the federal government also resulted in a special survey of Indians in conjunction with the 1890 census. The introduction to the census includes the following remarks, among others, on Indians (Measuring America 2002: 24).

By the phrase "Indians not taxed" is meant Indians living on reservations under the care of Government agents or roaming individually or in bands over unsettled tracts of country. Indians not in tribal relations, whether full-bloods or half-breeds, who are found mingled with the white population, residing in white families, engaged as servants or laborers, or living in huts or wigwams on the outskirts of towns or settlements, are to be regarded as a part of the ordinary population of the country, and are to be embraced by the enumeration.

The enumeration of Indians living on reservations will be made by special agents appointed directly from this office, and supervisors and enumerators will have no responsibility in this connection.

Top  

1900 5. Color or Race -- Whether white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian

"Negro" used in definition of "black"

White-blood quantum noted for Indians

General instructions to enumerators of the 1900 census included the following guidance (Measuring America 2002: 36, IPUMS 1900).

126. Column 5. Color or race. Write "W" for white; "B" for black (negro or negro descent); "Ch" for Chinese; "Jp" for Japanese, and "In" for Indian, as the case may be.

Indian Population

The Indian Schedule required enumerations such as these (Measuring America 2002: 44).

Column 33. -- If the Indian has no white blood, write 0. If he or she has white blood, write 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, whichever fraction is nearest the truth.

Column 34. -- If the Indian man is living with more than one wife, or if the Indian woman is a plural wife or has more than one husband, write "Yes." If not, write "No." If the Indian is single, leave the column blank.

Citizenship. -- If the Indian was born in this country, no entry can be made in columns 16, 17, or 18; but for columns 35, 36, and 37 answers must be obtained. If the Indian was born in another country, answers will be made both in columns 16, 17, and 18, and in columns 35, 36, and 37, in accordance with the facts.

Column 35. -- An Indian is to be considered "taxed" if he or she is detached from his or her tribe and living among white people as an individual, and as such subject to taxation, whether he or she actually pays taxes or not; also if he or she is living with his or her tribe but has received an allotment of land, and thereby has acquired citizenship; in either of these two cases the answer to this inquiry is "Yes." An Indian on a reservation, without an allotment, or roaming over unsettled territory, is considered "not taxed," and for such Indians the answer to this inquiry is "No."

Column 36. -- If the Indian was born in tribal relations, but has acquired American citizenship, write the year in which it was acquired. If he or she has not acquired citizenship, leave the column blank.

Column 37. -- If the Indian acquired citizenship by receiving an allotment of land from the Government, write "Yes." If he or she acquired citizenship by other means, write "No." If he or she has not acquired American citizenship, leave the column blank.

Top  

1910 6. Color or Race -- White, Black, Mulatto, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Other
31. Whether blind (both eyes), 32. Whether deaf and dumb

"Other" added to "Color or race" choices

"Quadroon" and "octoroon" dropped as subclassifications

Instructions to enumerators of the general census included this guidance concerning "Color or race" (Measuring America 2002: 48, IPUMS 1910).

108. Column 6. Color or race. -- Write "W" for white; "B" for black; "Mu" for mulatto; "Ch" for Chinese; "Jp" for Japanese; "In" for Indian. For all persons not falling within one of these classes, write "Ot" (for other), and write on the left-hand margin of the schedule the race of the person so indicated.

109. For census purposes, the term "black" (B) includes all persons who are evidently full-blooded negroes, while the term "mulatto" (Mu) includes all other persons having some proportion or perceptible trace of negro blood.

Mixed-blood Indians

The turn of the century witnessed further controversy over questions of effects of blood mixture involving Indians, and whether a person's blood quantum should determine whether the person could own or inherit a parcel of land allotted to an Indian. Census Bureau (as the Census Office was renamed in 1902) instructed enumerators of the special Indian Population schedule associated with the 1910 census as follows regarding the items on the "B" side of survey sheet (Measuring America 2002: 56)

Columns 36, 37, and 38. Proportions of Indian and other blood. -- If the Indian is a full-blood, write "full" in column 36, and leave columns 37 and 38 blank. If the Indian is of mixed blood, write in column 36, 37, and 38 the fractions which show the proportions of Indian and other blood, as (column 36, Indian) 3/4, (column 37, white) 1/4, and (column 38, negro) 0. For Indians of mixed blood all three columns should be filled, and the sum, in each case, should equal 1, as 1/2, 0, 1/2; 3/4, 1/4, 0; 3/4, 1/8, 1/8; etc. Wherever possible, the statement that an Indian is of full blood should be verified by inquiry of the older men of the tribe, as an Indian is sometimes of mixed blood without knowing it.

Top  

1920 10. Color or Race -- White, Black, Mulatto, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Hindu, Korean, Other

"Filipino", "Hindu", and "Koreans" added to subclassifications

Some publications added categories like Asian Hawaiians, part Hawaiian, "Mixed (rather than Chamorro or Polynesian)," and "Mixed (rather than Filipino)". (See Hochschild and Powell 2008.)

Enumerators received the following instructions regarding "Color or race" (IPUMS 1920).

120. Column 10. Color or race.-Write "W" for white, "B" for black; "Mu" for mulatto; "In" for Indian; "Ch" for Chinese; "Jp" for Japanese; "Fil" for Filipino; "Hin" for Hindu; "Kor" for Korean. for all persons not falling within one of these classes, write "Ot" (for other), and write on the left-hand margin of the schedule the race of the person so indicated.

121. For census purposes the term "black" (B) includes all Negroes of full blood, while the term "mulatto" (Mu) includes all Negroes having some proportion of white blood.

Top  

1930 12. Color or Race -- White, Black, Mexican, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Hindu, Korean, Other

Indians again classified on general schedule

"Mulatto" dropped

All "White and Negro" mixture "Negro" no matter how small the blood quantum
All "White and Indian" mixture "Indian" unless degree of Indian blood small
All "White" and "nonwhite" mixture classified by color of "nonwhite" parent
All mixtures of "colored races" classified by color of father

"Mexican" added

Mexicans are "Mexicans" unless definitely of another color or race

The enumerator instructions regarding "Color or race" in the 1930 census read as follows (cited from IPUMS 1930; only paraphrased in Measuring America 2002: 59.

150. Column 12. Color or race. -- Write "W" for white, "B" for black; "Mex" for Mexican; "In" for Indian; "Ch" for Chinese; "Jp" for Japanese; "Fil" for Filipino; "Hin" for Hindu; "Kor" for Korean. For a person of any other race, write the race in full.

151. Negroes. -- A person of mixed white and Negro blood should be returned as a Negro, no matter how small the percentage of Negro blood. Both black and mulatto persons are to be returned as Negroes, without distinction. A person of mixed Indian and Negro blood should be returned a Negro, unless the Indian blood predominates and the status as an Indian is generally accepted in the community.

152. Indians. -- A person of mixed white and Indian blood should be returned as Indian, except where the percentage of Indian blood is very small, or where he is regarded as a white person by those in the community where he lives. (Se par. 151 for mixed Indian and Negro.)

153. For a person reported as Indian in column 12, report is to be made in column 19 as to whether "full blood" or "mixed blood," and in column 20 the name of the tribe is to be reported. For Indians, columns 19 and 20 are thus to be used to indicate the degree of Indian blood and the tribe, instead of the birthplace of father and mother.

154. Mexicans. -- Practically all Mexican laborers are of a racial mixture difficult to classify, though usually well recognized in the localities where they are found. In order to obtain separate figures for this racial group, it has been decided that all person born in Mexico, or having parents born in Mexico, who are not definitely white, Negro, Indian, Chinese, or Japanese, should be returned as Mexican ("Mex").

155. Other mixed races. -- Any mixture of white and nonwhite should be reported according to the nonwhite parent. Mixtures of colored races should be reported according to the race of the father, except Negro-Indian (see par. 151).

The 1930 census included a Supplemental Schedule for the Indian Population, which included a "Full Blood or Mixed Blood" box before the "Tribe" box.

Top  

1940 10. Color or Race -- White (W), Negro (Neg), Indian (In), Chinese (Ch), Japanese (Jp), Filipino (Fil), Hindu (Hin), Korean (Kor), Other races, spell out in full
16. Citizenship of the foreign born -- Naturalized (Na), Having first papers (Pa), Alien (Al), American citizen born abroad (Am Cit)

"Negro" replaces "Black"

"Mexicans" are "white" unless definitely Indian or other

"Mulatto" -- introduced from 1850 census -- dropped from 1940 census.

"Other mixed races" rule on 1930 census becomes "Mixed races" on 1940 census.

"Mixtures of non-white races" distinction on 1930 census continues in 1940 census.

Measuring America states that, "With regard to race, the only change from 1930 was that Mexicans were to be listed as White unless they were definitely Indian or some race other than White" (Measuring America 2002: 64). The specific instructions were as follows (IPUMS 1940).

453. Column 10. Color or Race.-- Write "W" for white; "Neg" for Negro; "In" for Indian; "Chi" for Chinese; "Jp" for Japanese; "Fil" for Filipino; "Hi" for Hindu; and "Kor" for Korean. For a person of any other race, write the race in full.

454. Mexicans. -- Mexicans are to be regarded as white unless definitely of Indian or other nonwhite race.

455. Negroes. -- A person of mixed white and Negro blood should be returned as Negro, no matter how small a percentage of Negro blood. Both black and mulatto persons are to be returned as Negroes, without distinction. A person of mixed Indian and Negro blood should be returned as a Negro, unless the Indian blood very definitely predominates and he is universally accepted in the community as an Indian.

456. Indians. -- A person of mixed white and Indian blood should be returned as an Indian, if enrolled on an Indian agency or reservation roll, or if not so enrolled, if the proportion of Indian blood is one-fourth or more, or if the person is regarded as an Indian in the community where he lives.

457. Mixed Races. -- Any mixture of white and nonwhite should be reported according to the nonwhite parent. Mixtures of nonwhite races should be reported according to the race of the father, except that Negro-Indian should be reported as Negro.

Top  

1950 9. Race -- White (W), Negro (Neg), American Indian (Ind), Japanese (Jap), Chinese (Chi), Filipino (Fil), Hindu (Hin), Korean (Kor), Other race -- spell out

"Color or race" becomes just "Race"

2-letter "Race" abbreviations become 3 letters

The evolution from "Free" and "Slave" statuses to "Race" -- via "Color" and "Color and race" -- is complete. The classification scheme becomes more complicated.

Instructions concerning the completion of the "Race" box on the 1950 census form were as follows (IPUMS 1950).

Item 9. Race

114. Item 9. Determining and entering race. -- Write "W" for white; "Neg" for Negro; "Ind" for American Indian; "Chi" for Chinese; "Jap" for Japanese; "Fil" for Filipino. For a person of any other race, write the race in full. Assume that the race of related persons living in the household is the same as the race of your respondent, unless you learn otherwise. For unrelated persons (employees, hired hands, lodgers, etc.) you must ask the race, because knowledge of the housewife's race (for example) tells nothing of the maid's race.

115. Mexicans. -- Report "white" (W) for Mexicans unless they are definitely of Indian or other nonwhite race.

116. Negroes. -- Report "Negro" (Neg) for Negroes and for persons of mixed white and Negro parentage. A person of mixed Indian and Negro blood should be returned as a Negro, unless the Indian blood very definitely predominates and he is accepted in the community as an Indian. (Note, however, the exceptions described in par. l18 below.)

117. American Indians. -- Report "American Indian" (Ind) for persons of mixed white and Indian blood if enrolled on an Indian Agency or Reservation roll; if not so enrolled, they should still be reported as Indian if the proportion of Indian blood is one-fourth or more, or if they are regarded as Indians in the community where they live. (See par. 116 for persons of mixed Indian and Negro blood and also exceptions noted in par. 118.) In those counties where there are many Indians living outside of reservations, special care should be taken to obtain accurate answers to item 9.

118. Special communities. -- Report persons of mixed white, Negro, and Indian ancestry living in certain communities in the Eastern United States in terms of the name by which they are locally known.

The communities in question are of long standing and are locally recognized by special names, such as "Croatian," "Jackson White," "We-sort," etc. Persons of mixed Indian and Negro ancestry and mulattoes not living in such communities should be returned as "Negro" (see par. 116). When in doubt, describe the situation in a footnote.

119. Mixed parentage. -- Report race of nonwhite parent for persons of mixed white and nonwhite races. Mixtures of nonwhite races should be reported according to the race of the father. (Note, however, exceptions detailed in pars. 116 and 118 above.)

120. India. -- Persons originating in India should be reported as "Asiatic Indians."

"Jap" abbreviation

It appears that all racial classifications -- except "White" -- were abbreviated by their first 3 letters -- Neg, Ind, Chi, Jap, Fil. On earlier censuses, there were both 2-letter and 3-letter abbreviations.

Top  

1960
Enumerator-completed schedule

(P5) Is this person -- White, Negro, American Indian, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Part Hawaiian, Aleut, Eskimo, (etc.)? ____________________

Respondent-completed machine-readable schedule

Color or race
Wh   Neg   Ind     Jp   Chi   Fil   Other   Specify other
◯    ◯    ◯      ◯    ◯    ◯    ◯      . . . . . . . . . . .

1960 census first to use forms for self-enumeration

Part Hawaiian

Self-completed FOSDIC (Film Optical Sensing Device for Input to Computer) forms were mailed out to respondents living outside large cities. The machine-readable forms had circles, beside or below the choices, which respondents blackened with a pencil, though some items required writing. Enumerators continued to complete forms for people living in large cities.

Measuring America characterizes the instructions for "Race or color" as follows (Measuring America 2002: 72).

The instructions for completing P5 (race or color) by observation [by enumerator] directed that Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, or other persons of Latin descent would be classified as "White" unless they were definitely Negro, Indian, or some other race. Southern European and Near Eastern nationalities also were to be considered White. Asian Indians were to be classified as "Other," and "Hindu" written in.

"Part Hawaiian" included as specific racial classification.

Top  

1970

4. COLOR OR RACE. Fill one circle. If "Indian (American)," also give tribe. If "Other," also give race.

◯ White ◯ Negro or Black ◯ Indian (Amer.) Print tribe
◯ Japanese ◯ Chinese ◯ Filipino ◯ Hawaiian ◯ Korean ◯ Other -- Print race

13a. Where was this person born?
◯ This State
OR (Name of State or foreign country; or Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.)
13b. Is this person's origin or descent -- (Fill one circle)
◯ Mexican ◯ Puerto Rican ◯ Cuban ◯
◯ Central or South American ◯ Other Spanish ◯ No, none of these

"Black" restored but secondary to "Negro"

All forms designed for self-identification

"Aleut" and "Eskimo" on Alaska questionnaires
Soliciation of south-of-the-border descent

Measuring America characterizes the 1970 census design like this (Measuring America 2001: 77).

All answers were designed for self-identification on the part of the respondent, but the enumerator was allowed to fill in blanks by observation when this was possible. For item 4 (color or race), it was assumed that the respondent's relatives living in the unit were also of the same race unless the census taker learned otherwise. The enumerator's manual included a long list of possible written-in entries and how they were to be classified: For example, "Chicano," "LaRaza," "Mexican American," "Moslem," or "Brown" were to be changed to White, while "Brown (Negro)" would be considered as Negro or Black for census purposes.

A note at the bottom of the general form reads as follows (IPUMS).

Note: On the questionnaires used in Alaska, the categories "Aleut" and "Eskimo" were substituted for "Hawaiian" and "Korean" in question 4.

This was the first census to facilitate self-identification as someone of south-of-the-border origin or descent. The solicitation was made in the place of birth question.

Top  

1980

4. Is this person -- Fill one circle
◯ White ◯ Black or Negro ◯ Japanese ◯ Chinese ◯ Filipino ◯ Korean ◯ Vietnamese ◯ Indian (Amer.) Print tribe ◯ Asian Indian ◯ Hawaiian ◯ Guamanian ◯ Samoan ◯ Eskimo ◯ Aleut ◯ Other Specify

7. Is this person of Spanish/Hispanic origin or descent?
Fill one circle.
◯ No (not Spanish/Hispanic)
◯ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
◯ Yes, Puerto Rican
◯ Yes, Cuban
◯ Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic

"Black" becomes primary to "Negro"

Alaskan and Pacific races

Vietnamese and Asian Indians
"Spanish/Hispanic"

Alaskan (Eskimo, Aleut) and Pacific (Guamanian, Samoan) races included for first time.

"Vietnamese" and "Asian Indians" added to expanding list of Asians.

South-of-the-border descents grouped under overarching "Spanish/Hispanic" label.

Top  

1990

4. RACE
Fill ONE circle for the race that the person considers himself/herself to be.
If Indian (Amer.), print the name of the enrolled or principal tribe.
If Other Asian of Pacific Islander (API), print one group, for example:
Hmong, Fijian, Laotian, Thai, Tongan, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on.
◯ White ◯ Black or Negro ◯
Indian (Amer.) (Print the name of the enrolled or principal tribe.)
◯ Eskimo ◯ Aleut
Asian or Pacific Islander (API)
◯ Chinese ◯ Filipino ◯ Hawaiian ◯ Korean ◯ Vietnamese
◯ Japanese ◯ Asian Indian ◯ Samoan ◯ Guamanian ◯ Other API
◯ Other race (Print race)

7. Is this person of Spanish/Hispanic origin?
Fill ONE circle for each person.
If Yes, Other Spanish/Hispanic, print one group.
◯ No (not Spanish/Hispanic)
◯ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
◯ Yes, Puerto Rican
◯ Yes, Cuban
◯ Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic (Print one group, for example: Argentinian, Columbian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on.)

Provisions for writing in specific regional races

Introduction of "Asian Pacific Islander" category

Racial empowerment lobbyists succeeded in expanding the scope of the "Race" box to facilitate writing in specific regional races, and to group "Asian" and "Pacific Islanders" under the overarching "API" label. There is now a sharp delineation between (1) "White", (2) "African", (3) "American Indian" and Alaskan, and (4) "Asian and Pacific Islander" people.

Top  

2000

Note: Please answer BOTH questions 5 and 6.

5. Is this person Spanish/Hispanic/Latino?
Markthe "No" box if not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino.
No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino
☐ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
☐ Yes, Puerto Rican
☐ Yes, Cuban
☐ Yes, other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino -- Print group.

6. What is this person's race?
Markone or more races
to indicate what this person considers himself/herself to be.
☐ White ☐ Black, African Am., or Negro
☐ American Indian or Alaskan Native -- Print the name of the enrolled or principal tribe.
☐ Asian Indian ☐ Chinese ☐ Filipino ☐ Japanese ☐ Korean ☐ Vietnamese
☐ Other Asian -- Print race.
☐ Native Hawaiian ☐ Guamanian or Chamorro ☐ Samoan
☐ Other Pacific Islander -- Print race.
☐ Some other race -- Print race.

One or more races

"African American" added beween "Black" and "Negro"

Alaskan Natives, Native Hawaiians
Alphabetical ordering of Asian races
Spanish/Hispnaic/Latino

The 2000 census was the first to permit a choice of more than one race. As with earlier recent censuses, it continued the practice of listing "White" first. and other races in order of their "importance" or "dominance" in the political history of the population of the United States beginning from the 1st census in 1790.

"African American" added to "Black or Negro" label ahead of "Negro". The term "African descent" had been used in some U.S. laws since the 19th century, but this is first time the "black" and/or "negro" classification was "Africanized" in a the U.S. census.

Eskimos and Aleuts conflated in "Alaskan Native" category, and Hawaiians also "upgraded" to "Native" status.

Asian racial categories listed in Alphabetical order.

"Latino" added to "Spanish/Hispanic" label.

Top  

2010

NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 5 about Hispanic origin andQuestion 6 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races

5. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?
No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin
☐ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
☐ Yes, Puerto Rican
☐ Yes, Cuban
☐ Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin -- Print origin, for example, Argentinian, Columbian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on.

6. What is this person's race? Markone or more boxes.
☐ White ☐ Black, African Am., or Negro
☐ American Indian or Alaskan Native -- Print name of enrolled or principal tribe.
☐ Asian Indian ☐ Chinese ☐ Filipino ☐ Japanese ☐ Korean ☐ Vietnamese
☐ Other Asian -- Print race, for example, Hmong, Fijian, Laotian, Thai, Tongan, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on.
☐ Native Hawaiian ☐ Guamanian or Chamorro ☐ Samoan
☐ Other Pacific Islander -- Print race, for example, Fijian, Tongan, and so on.
☐ Some other race -- Print race.

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin

"Spanish" downgraded to end of collective label. "Spaniard" also comes at end of examples of "Other" specific labels related to this group.

Top  

2020

NOTE: Please answer BOTH Question 6 about Hispanic origin and Question 7 about race. For this census, Hispanic origins are not races.

6. Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?
No, not of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin
☐ Yes, Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano
☐ Yes, Puerto Rican
☐ Yes, Cuban
☐ Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin -- Print origin, for example, Salvadoran, Dominican, Columbian, Guatemalan, Ecuadorian, etc.

7. What is this person's race? Markone or more boxes.
☐ White -- Print, for example, German, Irish, English, Italian, Lebanese, Egyptian, etc.
☐ Black or African Am. -- Print, for example, African American, Jamaican, Haitian, Nigerian, Ethiopian, Somali, etc.
☐ American Indian or Alaska Native -- Print name of enrolled or principal tribe(s), for example, Navajo Nation, Blackfeet Tribe, Mayan, Aztec, Native Village of Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government, Nome Eskimo Community, etc.
☐ Chinese
☐ Filipino
☐ Asian Indian
☐ Vietnamese
☐ Korean
☐ Japanese
☐ Native Hawaiian
☐ Samoan
☐ Chamorro
☐ Other Asian -- Print, for example, Pakistani, Cambodian, Hmong, etc.
☐ Other Pacific Islander -- Print, for example, Tongan, Fijian, Marshallese, etc.
☐ Some other race -- Print race or origin.

"Negro" dropped leaving only "Black or African American"

"Negro", which became popular from the 1920s, and was widely embraced by organizations, media, and federal and state governments, replaced "Black" in the 1940-1960 censuses. Following the civil rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s, and the rise of "black" advocacy, "Black" was added to "Negro" -- following "Negro" -- in the 1970 census. The 1980 and 1990 censuses listed "Negro" after "Black". The 2000 and 2010 censuses added "African American" to the list after "Black" and before "Negro". The 2020 census dropped "Negro" from the list, leaving only "Black" and "African American".

Expansion, elaboration, and refinement of all "Race" classifications

Unlike earlier censuses, Census 2020 respondents are asked to specify the "origin" of all the races they mark. The examples include conventional "national origin" labels as well as "tribal" or "community" labels. As in censuses since 2000, respondents could mark the "Some other race" box in addition to one or more of the other race boxes -- and specify the other "race or origin".

Top  

"Dr. Fairchild . . . says that . . .
biracial individuals
who are ambiguous about
their Black parentage [are]
victims of a racist society
and the solution would be in
raising their consciousness . . . ."

"It is healthy for
a person who is part Black
to affirm their Blackness
by saying, 'I'm Black . . . .'"

Lynn Norment concludes her article with the above quotation from a sociologist who believes that "the Black community" has a politically justified claim on the racial loyalty of biracial people who might not wish to call themselves "Black" or otherwise identify with the "community".

Robin Givens on cover of March 1990 Ebony

Yosha Bunko scans

Norment 1990
Norment 1990 Norment 1990
Norment 1990 Norment 1990

Kwame Anthony Appiah
writing for The Atlantic
in a newsletter dated 18 June 2020
advocates casing words for races eually
because all putative races are equally fictitious

In other words, a "black / Black" race
can only be imputed relative to other races
whether "white / White" or "yellow / Yellow"
or whatever "color / Color" one imagines

Image captured from
www.theatlantic.com
21 May 2023

Appiah 2020
Adichie 2023 Adichie 2023

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Americanah
London: Fourth Estate, 2013
Yosha Bunko scans

Case as ideology

"Black / white" versus "Black / White" and "black / white"

2020 witnessed a shift in attitudes toward the writing of "black" and "white" as one major American newspaper or magazine after another adopted the practice of capitalizing "Black" as a matter of style. Many publishers continued to write "white" in lower case but some also began to capitalize "White".

The movement to write "black" with a big "B" was not new. But the use of "black" and "white" as racial terms is old.

The United States conducted its first decennial census in 1790. But the 1850 census was the first to use "black" along with "white" and "mulatto". As classifications of "Color or race" on enumeration sheets, these words were capitalized, and uppercase W, B, and M were used to mark race in boxes under the "Color or race" column.boxes. In definitions, however these three terms were not capitalized.

Lowercase "negro" was first used in definitions of lowercase "black" from the 1900 census. And from the 1910 census, "negro" also figured in the definition of "mulatto". Hence census takers read instructions like these.

1900   Write "W" for white; "B" for black (negro or negro descent)

1910   For census purposes, the term "black" (B) includes all persons who are evidently full-blooded negroes, while the term "mulatto" (Mu) includes all other persons having some proportion or perceptible trace of negro blood.

"mulatto" (M) was dropped from the 1930 census, and "negro" (N) replaced "black" (B) from the 1940 census. The 1970 census used "Negro or Black", the 1980 and 1990 censuses "Black or Negro", the 2000 and 2010 censuses "Black, African Am., or Negro", and the 2020 census "Black or African Am."

The capitalization of "Black" and "White" on census forms was not, however, a recognition of "black" and "white" as proper nouns. The capitalization was simply an artifact of the stylistic practice of capitalizing these terms when used in lists of "Color or race" or "Race" choices. In definitions and explanations, both "black" and "white" -- and "mulatto" when it was used -- were generally written in lower case.

The recent (21st century) push for the capitalization of "black" on a par with the capitalization of geographical or national ethnonyms like African or Nigerian, Asian or Indian, and European or Irish began in earnest after George Floyd (1973-2020) died on 25 May 2020 from the effects of what a court ruled was excessive use of police force. The incident triggered the Black Lives Movement, which gave momentum to the on-going movement in journalism and elsewhere to capitalize "black" in order to recognize not only biological descent but membership in a distinct racioethnic "community" that shared a common history and culture.

On 20 June 2020, less than a month after Floyd was killed, the Associated Press, in an article titled AP changes writing style to capitalize "b" in Black, announced that, on the previous day, it had adopted the practice of capitalizing "black" but was still considering whether to also capitalize "white". The Associated Press Stylebook is widely considered the gold standard of usage and mechanics in American journalism, and many major papers and other publications began to declare their adoption of big "B" policy.

Prior to this, most style books preferred writing both "black" and "white" in lower case as descriptors of race. A growing number of individuals and organizations, however, argued that people who considered themselves "black" were members of a "community" that shared a degree of so-called "blackness" -- a distinctly "black" culture or ethnicity. Ergo, "black" should be capitalized in the manner of other so-called "ethnic groups" defined by common geographical, national, or cultural origins.

Radical proponents of "black" capitalization argue that "white" should not be capitalized because "white" is not an ethnicity. People who consider themselves "white" do not share a common historical experience or culture. Moreover, as the dominant race, they have been privileged, whereas "blacks" and other "people of color" continue to suffer discrimination on the part of whites.

Some people also see the capitalization of "white" as siding with white supremacists who capitalize "white" as an expression of pride in their putative "whiteness" as a standard of purity to be protected from mixture with "colored" races.

Capitalization has been invested with a variety meanings, all related to visual stress. Here the stress is ideological. Apart from the problem of whether such stress is warranted, it travels only in writing. For case is graphic, not linguistic. Case distinctions are moot in speech. Linguistically, they are useless.

Case distinctions

Users of English don't make case distinctions in speech, because language is what the mouth does to express thoughts and feelings in sounds to be heard by the ear and processed and understood in the brain. While writing is intended to represent language, it is not itself language, but script to be seen by the ear and processed and understood in the brain.

Not all elements of speech are recorded when transcribing what someone has said, and not all elements of writing are expressed when reciting what someone has written. Dialect differences are usually not reflected in writing. The same word, pronounced differently, will generally be spelled the same way. Conversely, no written word pronounces itself -- hence pronunciations vary according to the reader.

The meanings of words, while to some degree shared, are never perfectly shared. No word, spoken or written, defines itself. Whatever meanings a speaker or writer intends, are at the mercy of the understandings of the listener or reader.

In English and most other languages that use alphabetic scripts, there are "case" options -- meaning choices between "big" (capital) and "small" (non-capital) letters. "Big" letters are also called "upper case", and "small" letters are called "lower case" -- because printers customarily sort type for big letters in the upper part of a case of type, and type for small letters in the lower part.

Every writing system with case options, however, has it own conventions regarding how case is used. In English, the first word of a sentence is usually capitalized, but there are exceptions. "i" used as a personal pronoun is usually capitalized "I", but again there may be exceptions.

The first letters of nouns considered "proper" -- place names, personal names, the names of organizations and official titles -- are usually capitalized. Words invested with sacred or other special meanings may be capitalized -- as were "Faith" or "Charity" or even "Virginity" in some Victorian writing, and in a few religious tracts even today.

"god" creates problems for religious people -- from those who believe in a pantheon of gods and impute various traits to "the gods that be", to monotheists who believe in a single, omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent "God". But when speaking English, there is no distinction between "god" and "Gods". "do you believe in god? and "Do you believe in God?" are linguistically the same. Yet most writers and editors will write "Do you believe in God?" Even an atheist might refrain from writing "I don't believe in god."

The point is that "case" is 100 percent in the head. Big/small letter conventions have absolutely zero linguistic significance -- remembering, again, that writing is not language.

Language pleases or assaults the ears. Writing indulges or insults the eyes.

People who feel good reading "Black and white" in reference to putative races will balk or frown at "Black and White" and "black and white", and will cringe at "black and White". But case is not linguistic. "b/w" and "B/w" and "b/W" and "B/W" are the same when recited. The ear cannot hear case. Case distinctions -- whether "i" or "I" or "god" or "God" -- or even "asia" and "Asian" -- are inventions of one or another spelling ideology.

Why, then, have not a few writers and editors -- especially in the United States -- adopted the practice of writing "Black" while writing "white"? What are the intentions of such a distinction? And what are the objections?

Top  


1990-03

Lynn Norment on who's Black or not

Racial mixture poses threat for "Black community"

Lynn Norment
Who's Black And Who's Not?
(New ethnicity raises provocative questions about racial identity)
Ebony
March 1990, Vol. 45, No. 5
Pages 134, 136, 138-139 (4 pages)

The March 1990 issue of Ebony carried a 4-page cover story titled "Who's Black And Who's Not?" by Lynn Norment. At time, she was one of the magazine's three staff editors. Later she became a managing editor.

Norment's article is typographically the most conspiciously billed cover story -- not withstanding the story on cover girl actress Robbin Givens. "The New Ethnicity" alludes to people of mixed-race, specifically black-white descent, who choose not identify as either of the two putative races. Norment takes the position that all such people should identify as "Black" and not "White" -- she capitalizes both races.

Putatively mixed people have the choice of identifying as both black and white, black but not white, white but not black, or neither black nor white. They also also have the choice of identifying as biracial or multiracial -- or even raceless, i.e., just human. If pushed to racially classify themselves, they also have the option of saying "Whatever I am, or think I am, is none of your business."

Norment examines the question of "Who's Black And Who's Not" by looking at how celebrities and others of mixed racial descent identify. She laments that some such celebrities are quick to avow that they are not "Black" but slow to avow that they are not "White".

The story editorially argues that people with both "Black" and "White" ancestors should not only identify as "Black", but should feel obliged recognize that they are members of a "Black" community that shares a "Black" culture. As mixed marriages increase, mixed offpsring increase. And every mixed person who chooses not to check the "Black" box on a census or other race and/or ethnicity survey means one less "Black" person -- hence fewer "Blacks" in companies and schools, or on committes and boards, that use racial racial statistics to determine ratios of representation in employment, admissions, or membership.

Top  


2020-06-18

Kwame Anthony Appiah "White" as well as "Black"

To signify that whiteness is not the invisible norm

Kwame Anthony Appiah
The Case for Capitalizing the B in Black
Black and white are both historically created racial identities -- and whatever rule applies to one should apply to the other.
The Atlantic
18 June 2020

In this article, Kwame Anthony Appiah, a British-American philosopher and professor of philosophy and law at New York University, reviews all manner of opinion about whether or not to capitalize words for putative races. The manner in which he weaves different opinions together creates the impresson that racialist ideology lurks behind all arguments, which makes them arbitrary.

The illustration at the start of the article shows an example of editorial markup -- three lines under a lowercase letter -- for changing "black" to "Black". The subhead under the title, however, advocates that -- whatever case is used to write the names of putative races -- racial labels should be written in the same case.

Appiah's concluding graph begins like this.

Reasoned arguments about linguistic usages must always reckon with the fact that language is a set of conventions, to be determined by the consensus of language users. (That's why I've been content here to comply with the punctuating conventions of this publication.) There's no objectively correct answer to the question of whether to capitalize black and white in advance of such a consensus.

Appiah's usage of "black and white" is contrary to the "Black and white" usage that one finds in practically all articles that appear in The Atlantic.

As for puncutation -- writers not infrequently find themselves at odds with editorial changes of their punctuation. And discussions between editors and writers over a single comma can get heated. In such arguments, house style does not necessarily have the upper hand. In publications edited by people who strongly favor one or another ideological standard for choice and case of racial labels, however, writers are under enormous pressure to either submit, or have their submissions declined.

Top  


2020-06-30

Shirley Carswell declares capitalized "Black" a win"

Who "gets it" versus who has the authority to "make the call"

Shirley Carswell
Why news organizations' move to capitalize 'Black' is a win
The Washington Post
30 June 2020 at 9:07 a.m. EDT

Carswell's article, classified as "Opinion", begins with this anecdote (The Washington Post, 30 June 2020).

Every semester at least a few of my journalism students at Howard University objected when I told them the letter "b" should be lowercase in their news articles about black people.

Understanding their pride in their race and resentment of implications that it doesn't rate capitalization, I would tell them that "I get it, but it's not my call."

I referred them to the Associated Press Stylebook, the journalist's bible for rules on writing, which, until about a week ago, said that black should not be capitalized as a racial identifier.

Carswell is essentially confessing her willingness to accept the status quo rather than advocate for change. The authority of stylebooks -- or rather of editors who insist on conforming to the dictates one or another stylebook, or a house style substitute -- intimidates most writers, who will similar say "it's not my call."

However, Carswell continues, "On June 19, AP became the latest media organization to change its policy to capitalize "Black" when the word is used in "a racial, ethnic or cultural context."

After listing a number of newspapers that jumped on the "Black" rather than "black" bandwagon, Carswell writes that "there is not uniformity among black Americans about black vs. Black" (ibid).

Sensibilities also vary among audiences. Black-focused publications such as Ebony magazine, the Afro-American Newspapers and others have long rendered "Black" with a capital "B." But there is not uniformity among black Americans about black vs. Black. Some argue that if black is capitalized as a racial identifier, then brown must also be capitalized. The same treatment would extend to white, which, problematically, is a style often used by white supremacist groups. Others see capitalizing black as a change that legitimizes perceived racial differences at a time when the focus should be tearing down race constructs created to elevate those of European descent over those they enslaved. Still others dismiss the debate as a distraction from more important issues such as economic inequality and criminal justice reform.

Top  


2023-07-29

The Washington Post jumps on the "Black" bandwagon

But also declares equal treatment of "Whites" as a discrete culture

WashPostPR
The Washington Post announces writing style changes for racial and ethnic identifiers
The Post to capitalize Black to identify groups that make up the African diaspora. The Washginton Post
29 July 2020 at 8:59 a.m. EDT

Note that Carswell's 30 June 2020 article in The Washington Post states that "black Americans" -- not "Black Americans" -- did not have unform views of the "black vs. Black" issue. Assuming that she personally supported the "Black" faction, then it appears that the "black" was not her call.

At the time her article was published, The Washington Post was in fact following a lower-case "b" standard. A month later, however, the newspaper ran a PR piece announcing its decision to adopt the upper-case "B" standard.

The article also disclosed that upper-case "White" would be similarly be used as a "racial or ethnic identifier" or "racial descriptor" -- because "Whites" also represent a "distinct cultural identity" (The Washington Post (29 July 2020).

This style change [from "black" to "Black"] also prompts the question of how America's largest racial community should be identified. Stories involving race show that White also represents a distinct cultural identity in the United States.

The Washington Post article, like all endorsements of upper case for putative "races" or "ethnicities", resorts to the articles of its kind, adoptsresorts to the same sort of ""community"

Top  


2023-05-12

Chimamanda Adichie prefers "White" as well as "Black"

To signify that whiteness is not the invisible norm

Chimamanda Adichie
How I Became Black in America
It's been 10 years since the publication of Americanah. What's changed?
The Atlantic
12 May 2023

Americanah, Chimamand Ngozi Adichie's 3rd novel, is an extremely readable story about a young Nigerian woman who comes to American and discovers what it's like to be an African in America.

Ifemelu, the protagonist, accompany's a friend, Ginika, to a clothing store where there are two thin-armed sales clerks in all black. Ine was "chocolate-skinned" and her was was a "long black weave highlighted with auburn". The other was "white" and her "inky hair" was "floating behind her" as she came up to help them.

Ginika selects a dress and takes it to the blonde cashier, who asks which salesperson helped them, to credit her for the sale so she gets the commission. Ginika didn't get her name.

"Was it the one with long hair?" the cashier asks. Both had long hair. "The one with dark hair?" Both had dark hair. Never mind, the cashier says, she'll ask them when they come out from the back where they were busy in the fitting rooms.

Outside the store, Ifemelu asks why the cashier didn't simply ask "Was it the black girl or the white girl?" Ginika explains, "Because this is America. You're supposed to pretend that you don't notice certain things." (Page 126-127).

In an earlier episode, Ginika -- a friend from Nigeria who came to America before Ifemelu -- tells her that, in America, "half-caste" is a bad word, hence she began to call herself bi-racial. (Pages 123-124)

Ifemelu, intrigued by race issues in America, writes an anonymous blog called Raceteenth or Various Observations About American Blacks (Those Formerly Known as Negroes) by a Non-American Black. Ifemelu writes of "blacks" and "whites" -- as does her creator Adichie, except when writing for publications that prefer "Blacks" and "whites".

In an article from the May 2023 issue of The Atlantic, in which she revisits Americanah a decade after its release, she writes this paragraph, using "Black" and "White" -- and qualifies her use of "White" for readers of The Atlantic, who are accustomed to the magazines (poltiically correct) "Black" and "white" editorial policy.

Shortly after the Black American George Floyd was murdered by a White police officer, a woman told me she had just read Americanah. "You are a prophet; you foresaw this," she said, as if my novel were preparation for the social and cultural reckoning about Blackness that began as a result of Floyd's murder. And yet, even though mainstream women's magazines now include braids in general roundups of style choices, the shift is hardly seismic. The Black experience is not yet so ordinary that it becomes, as the White experience has been for centuries in America, invisible, and therefore the norm. (I capitalize White in my writing, like Black, because to lowercase it perpetuates this idea of whiteness as the invisible norm.)

Top